The history of the origins of the concept of 'homosexuality' shouts out loud that 'homosexuality' refers to queer's sexuality for men, not men's sexuality for men. And that the entire concept is a conspiracy against men.
The people upon whom the concept of 'homosexuality' was first coined were the mollies -- those who were known by the then Western society, not as men, but as members of the third sex -- like anywhere in the world. But their femininity was still misdefined as "males who get anally/ orally penetrated".
Those who invented the concept of 'homosexuality', sought to study these people clinically, under science, and it did not any special talents to see these flamboyant, effeminate, gaudy, individuals as being 'different'. However, the 'scientists' defined their difference in terms of their sexual preferences. So far so good.
The conspiracy angle comes in in the fact, that they defined their sexual preferences, and thus their femininity not in terms of their desire to receive anal/ oral sex from men, but as "male sexual desire for men". This one sweeping act of generalization brought the entire gamut of men's desire for men' into the stigmatized 'queer' category.
What followed was what the conspirators had wanted to do... the media widely popularized the queer sexuality for men, as 'men's sexuality for men', They would deride queers and make fun of them as 'homosexuals', i.e. men who liked men. And the real men (i.e. masculine males), who were almost 100 percent into sex with other men, albeit secretly, started disowning their sexual interest in men, in order to avoid being counted as 'queer'. However, they still had not taken upon the heterosexual identity -- they would never do that -- because it would be a further burden on them.
It was the conspirators, who, along with the new category of 'homosexuals' they had invented and empowered, invented the term 'heterosexual' and later 'straight' to describe those who were trying hard to disown their sexual interest in men, and to divert all their sexual needs towards women, in order to avoid a fate they consider worse than death. To be counted as one of the queers. And indeed, if you look at the stigma attached with the word 'homosexual' or 'gay', you know that it is the same thing as the 'mollies' or the 'third gender' of the early modern era.
No wonder, the 'heterosexual' or 'straight' identity became the most sought after thing for normal, masculine, non-queer males. The conspirators had succeeded. They had finally achieved what their forefathers had desired, but could never hope to succeed in doing. To wipe out men's sexual need for men from the mainstream altogether, and to break men completely from other men. Indeed, in the hysteria the conspirators have later created using the threat of being labelled 'gay', western men today are scared to hold each other's hands in public, when their forefathers kissed each other as social greeting. The media, as usual, is in the forefront of this heterosexualization/ homosexualization, followed by peer-pressure, through which a competition to prove one's heterosexuality and repulsion towards 'homosexuality' (sic) is enforced upon young men.
Today the conspirators, whom we call the Forces of Heterosexualization, and that includes 'homosexuals', can easily sit back and, as far as they are concerned, honestly claim, that 'straight' is about being naturally 'heterosexual' and that they don't have any sexual interest in men. And that anyone, who has a sexual interest in men is necessarily 'gay'.
The contemporary versions of these conspirators are the likes of Bailey, who are bent upon further concretizing this final defeat of men's social/physical/emotional need for men by 'proving' scientifically, using the effeminate 'gays' and the masculine 'straights' as their study base, that 'men who like men' have biological traits of women, including their brain structures, their gait, etc. And that the Queer heterosexuals who are now emerging and who are challenging the conspirator's claim that heterosexualty = straightness, are being scientifically 'proven' to not be really queers. They are also bent upon defeating the 'bisexual' brigade that is also threatening the stigma imposed upon the 'straight' population, by claiming that there is no real 'bisexuality' and bisexuals are merely 'gay' males.
There are hordes of other myths being promoted in the name of science, using this wrong and invalid foundation of sexual orientation, upon the politics of which, the entire western population is structured. E.g., it is women, they claim, who are more commonly 'bisexual', than men. Men are, as a majority, constantly and exclusively heterosexual, as per their claims. Of course, this serves to add to the pressures upon men to be exclusively heterosexual, if they want to be counted as men and not queers.
All in all, the entire social set up, led by the institutions of Science, Media and Peer-pressure are making sure that straight men grow up to be heterosexuals, while the minority who doesn't are marginalized as 'gays', and nobody suspects a thing. Of course, they close their eyes completely to all the biological, historical, contemporary cultural, etc. evidences that shouts in their face that they are wrong. They not only ignore these evidences, but they also seek to destroy them, to misinterpret them, redefine them and to ascribe false 'causes' to them, in order to protect them from challenging their lies. Isn't this how most oppressive systems in the world function? -- heterosexuality, Judio/Christian/Islamic religions, Caste system, apartheid, Communism, and so on -- they all work in similar fashions, by not allowing anyone or anything to challenge their lies.
Their are immense documentations of the institution of Science destroying the evidences of widespread male sexuality for other males in biology (wildlife science), history and culture. Innumerable western 'experts' seek to write off the widespread male intimacies in the non-western world as "inability to find female partners due to social restrictions". They even go so far as to paint the non-western males as 'effeminate' (e.g. one ridiculous claim that Muslim males wear eye-liners, and this makes them effeminate, and then relating this to the widespread male intimacy in Islamic cultures... eye-liners are not inherently feminine, they are not held to be such in the Islamic world, and macho males wear them too. When the society acknowledges the real differences between men and women, men do not have to resort to such artificial differences to maintain their sense of manhood. And is it very scientific for these 'experts' to judge non-western cultures of manhood through the artificial social roles prevalent in the West?). All in all, its a deep, deep rooted conspiracy against men, and one that is the most difficult to fight against, if only because, the west and these forces of heterosexualization, are extremely powerful today, due to vast industrialization -- economically, technologically and politically. They are busy denouncing the values prevalent in the rest of the world as 'backward' and thrusting their conspiracies upon them in the name of more civlised way of living.
The concept of 'homosexuality' as it is defined on the facade, is invalid too. There is no justification for considering man's sexuality for men as separate because all men have a sexual need for men. Today, the western society has suppressed this biological fact so deep, and covered the rest in the straight community, that it is difficult for a non-straight male (which means non-masculine males and women) especially, gays to believe this to be true.
It's like inventing a concept called "two earsnality", the trait of having two ears... Why, because everyone has two ears, except a rare few. The basic assumptions behind the concept of 'homosexuality' are wrong. And upon that, if you see the lies built later on this foundation, to build this concept of 'homosexuality' on the 'third sex' space to further stigmatize it as 'queer', then the entire thing becomes a HUGE conspiracy to break men from men.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment